Home  /  Compare  /  Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Head to head

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

Verdict by category

CategoryClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5Winner
League Score97.396.4Claude Fable 5.1
Coding (SWE-bench %)———
Reasoning (GPQA %)93.7——
Context (tokens)10000001000000Draw
Speed (tok/s)—75.6—
Price (blended $/1M)$20.00$8.00Claude Opus 5.5 (cheaper)

Tale of the tape

SpecClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5
MakerAnthropicAnthropic
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Sep 22, 2026
League Score9796
Context1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output128,000128,000
$/1M input$10.00$4.00
$/1M output$50.00$20.00
WeightsClosedClosed
Speed—75.6 t/s

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5
LiveBench overall88.086.5

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5
Light — 1M in / 250K out$22.50$9.00
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out$225.00$90.00
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out$750.00$300.00

The pick

Pick Claude Fable 5.1 if you want the higher overall League Score.

Pick Claude Opus 5.5 if you want the lower running cost.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5.5?

On overall League Score they are effectively tied — Claude Fable 5.1 scores 97 and Claude Opus 5.5 scores 96. The category verdicts on this page are where the real differences live.

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper: $8.00 vs $20.00 blended per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output mix) — about 2.5x less per token.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Neither — both take 1M of context.

Are Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5.5 open source?

Claude Fable 5.1 is closed weights — API access only; Claude Opus 5.5 is closed weights — API access only.