Home  /  Compare  /  Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder
Head to head

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

Verdict by category

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5Muse WonderWinner
League Score96.476.4Claude Opus 5.5
Coding (SWE-bench %)———
Reasoning (GPQA %)———
Context (tokens)10000001048576Muse Wonder
Speed (tok/s)75.6——
Price (blended $/1M)$8.00$8.00Muse Wonder (cheaper)

Tale of the tape

SpecClaude Opus 5.5Muse Wonder
MakerAnthropicMeta
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Oct 12, 2026
League Score9676
Context1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000—
$/1M input$4.00$4.00
$/1M output$20.00$20.00
WeightsClosedClosed
Speed75.6 t/s—

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Muse Wonder
LiveBench overall86.578.1

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadClaude Opus 5.5Muse Wonder
Light — 1M in / 250K out$9.00$9.00
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out$90.00$90.00
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out$300.00$300.00

The pick

Pick Claude Opus 5.5 if you want the higher overall League Score.

Pick Muse Wonder if you need the bigger context window.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Wonder?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads on overall League Score, 96 to 76 — a gap of 20 points on a composite of sourced benchmarks. That is overall form, not every category: check the per-category verdicts before choosing.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Wonder?

They cost the same on our blended measure: $8.00 per 1M tokens each.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1M of context against 1M for Claude Opus 5.5.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Wonder open source?

Claude Opus 5.5 is closed weights — API access only; Muse Wonder is closed weights — API access only.