Home  /  Compare  /  Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Wonder
Head to head

Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Wonder.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

Verdict by category

CategoryClaude Opus 5Muse WonderWinner
League Score91.776.4Claude Opus 5
Coding (SWE-bench %)96.0——
Reasoning (GPQA %)93.2——
Context (tokens)10000001048576Muse Wonder
Speed (tok/s)———
Price (blended $/1M)$10.00$8.00Muse Wonder (cheaper)

Tale of the tape

SpecClaude Opus 5Muse Wonder
MakerAnthropicMeta
ReleasedJul 24, 2026Oct 12, 2026
League Score9276
Context1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output128,000—
$/1M input$5.00$4.00
$/1M output$25.00$20.00
WeightsClosedClosed
Speed——

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Muse Wonder
LiveBench overall82.178.1

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadClaude Opus 5Muse Wonder
Light — 1M in / 250K out$11.25$9.00
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out$112.50$90.00
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out$375.00$300.00

The pick

Pick Claude Opus 5 if you want the higher overall League Score; coding is the priority.

Pick Muse Wonder if you need the bigger context window; you want the lower running cost.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Claude Opus 5 or Muse Wonder?

Claude Opus 5 leads on overall League Score, 92 to 76 — a gap of 15 points on a composite of sourced benchmarks. That is overall form, not every category: check the per-category verdicts before choosing.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder is cheaper: $8.00 vs $10.00 blended per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output mix) — about 1.2x less per token.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1M of context against 1M for Claude Opus 5.

Are Claude Opus 5 and Muse Wonder open source?

Claude Opus 5 is closed weights — API access only; Muse Wonder is closed weights — API access only.