Home  /  Compare  /  Command A+ vs Gemini 4 Carbon
Head to head

Command A+ vs Gemini 4 Carbon.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

VS
Google DeepMind

Verdict by category

CategoryCommand A+Gemini 4 CarbonWinner
League Score0.0——
Coding (SWE-bench %)51.0——
Reasoning (GPQA %)———
Context (tokens)1280001000000Gemini 4 Carbon
Speed (tok/s)———

Tale of the tape

SpecCommand A+Gemini 4 Carbon
MakerCohereGoogle DeepMind
ReleasedMay 20, 2026Oct 28, 2026
League Score0—
Context128,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output64,000—
$/1M input—$2.00
$/1M output—$10.00
WeightsOpenClosed
Speed——

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkCommand A+Gemini 4 Carbon
No shared benchmark measurements yet — shown as not measured, never interpolated.

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadCommand A+Gemini 4 Carbon
Light — 1M in / 250K out—$4.50
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out—$45.00
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out—$150.00

The pick

Pick Command A+ if you want downloadable weights / self-hosting; coding is the priority.

Pick Gemini 4 Carbon if you need the bigger context window.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Only Gemini 4 Carbon has published API pricing in our database ($4.00 blended per 1M tokens); Command A+ has no tracked API price, so a like-for-like cost verdict is not possible.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon, with 1M of context against 128K for Command A+.

Are Command A+ and Gemini 4 Carbon open source?

Command A+ is open weights — it can be downloaded and self-hosted; Gemini 4 Carbon is closed weights — API access only.