Home  /  Compare  /  Command A+ vs Inkling 2 Small
Head to head

Command A+ vs Inkling 2 Small.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

VS
Thinking Machines Lab

Verdict by category

CategoryCommand A+Inkling 2 SmallWinner
League Score0.0——
Coding (SWE-bench %)51.0——
Reasoning (GPQA %)———
Context (tokens)128000262144Inkling 2 Small
Speed (tok/s)———

Tale of the tape

SpecCommand A+Inkling 2 Small
MakerCohereThinking Machines Lab
ReleasedMay 20, 2026Nov 5, 2026
League Score0—
Context128,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output64,000—
$/1M input——
$/1M output——
WeightsOpenClosed
Speed——

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkCommand A+Inkling 2 Small
No shared benchmark measurements yet — shown as not measured, never interpolated.

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadCommand A+Inkling 2 Small
Light — 1M in / 250K out——
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out——
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out——

The pick

Pick Command A+ if you want downloadable weights / self-hosting; coding is the priority.

Pick Inkling 2 Small if you need the bigger context window.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or Inkling 2 Small?

Inkling 2 Small, with 262.1K of context against 128K for Command A+.

Are Command A+ and Inkling 2 Small open source?

Command A+ is open weights — it can be downloaded and self-hosted; Inkling 2 Small is closed weights — API access only.