Home  /  Compare  /  Grok 4.3 vs Muse Wonder
Head to head

Grok 4.3 vs Muse Wonder.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

xAI (SpaceXAI)
VS

Verdict by category

CategoryGrok 4.3Muse WonderWinner
League Score73.779.0Muse Wonder
Coding (SWE-bench %)———
Reasoning (GPQA %)90.1——
Context (tokens)10000001048576Muse Wonder
Speed (tok/s)151.8——
Price (blended $/1M)$1.56$8.00Grok 4.3 (cheaper)

Tale of the tape

SpecGrok 4.3Muse Wonder
MakerxAI (SpaceXAI)Meta
ReleasedApr 30, 2026Oct 12, 2026
League Score7479
Context1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output——
$/1M input$1.25$4.00
$/1M output$2.50$20.00
WeightsClosedClosed
Speed151.8 t/s—

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Muse Wonder
No shared benchmark measurements yet — shown as not measured, never interpolated.

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadGrok 4.3Muse Wonder
Light — 1M in / 250K out$1.88$9.00
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out$18.75$90.00
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out$75.00$300.00

The pick

Pick Grok 4.3 if you want the lower running cost.

Pick Muse Wonder if you want the higher overall League Score; you need the bigger context window.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Grok 4.3 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads on overall League Score, 79 to 74 — a gap of 5 points on a composite of sourced benchmarks. That is overall form, not every category: check the per-category verdicts before choosing.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Muse Wonder?

Grok 4.3 is cheaper: $1.56 vs $8.00 blended per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output mix) — about 5.1x less per token.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1M of context against 1M for Grok 4.3.

Are Grok 4.3 and Muse Wonder open source?

Grok 4.3 is closed weights — API access only; Muse Wonder is closed weights — API access only.