Home  /  Compare  /  Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8-Max
Head to head

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8-Max.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

xAI (SpaceXAI)
VS
Alibaba Qwen

Verdict by category

CategoryGrok 4.7Qwen3.8-MaxWinner
League Score66.865.0Grok 4.7
Coding (SWE-bench %)———
Reasoning (GPQA %)—92.6—
Context (tokens)5000001000000Qwen3.8-Max
Speed (tok/s)87.637Grok 4.7
Price (blended $/1M)$3.00$3.00Qwen3.8-Max (cheaper)

Tale of the tape

SpecGrok 4.7Qwen3.8-Max
MakerxAI (SpaceXAI)Alibaba Qwen
ReleasedSep 21, 2026Aug 3, 2026
League Score6765
Context500,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output—131,072
$/1M input$2.00$2.00
$/1M output$6.00$6.00
WeightsClosedOpen
Speed87.6 t/s37 t/s

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3.8-Max
LiveBench overall70.161.6

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadGrok 4.7Qwen3.8-Max
Light — 1M in / 250K out$3.50$3.50
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out$35.00$35.00
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out$130.00$130.00

The pick

Pick Grok 4.7 if you want the higher overall League Score.

Pick Qwen3.8-Max if you need the bigger context window; you want downloadable weights / self-hosting.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8-Max?

Grok 4.7 leads on overall League Score, 67 to 65 — a gap of 2 points on a composite of sourced benchmarks. That is overall form, not every category: check the per-category verdicts before choosing.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8-Max?

They cost the same on our blended measure: $3.00 per 1M tokens each.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8-Max?

Qwen3.8-Max, with 1M of context against 500K for Grok 4.7.

Are Grok 4.7 and Qwen3.8-Max open source?

Grok 4.7 is closed weights — API access only; Qwen3.8-Max is open weights — it can be downloaded and self-hosted.