Home  /  Compare  /  Inkling vs Muse Spark Open
Head to head

Inkling vs Muse Spark Open.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

Thinking Machines Lab
VS

Verdict by category

CategoryInklingMuse Spark OpenWinner
League Score24.627.4Muse Spark Open
Coding (SWE-bench %)———
Reasoning (GPQA %)———
Context (tokens)2621441048576Muse Spark Open
Speed (tok/s)———

Tale of the tape

SpecInklingMuse Spark Open
MakerThinking Machines LabMeta
ReleasedJul 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026
League Score2527
Context262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output——
$/1M input——
$/1M output——
WeightsOpenOpen
Speed——

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkInklingMuse Spark Open
LiveBench overall47.051.6

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadInklingMuse Spark Open
Light — 1M in / 250K out——
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out——
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out——

The pick

Pick Muse Spark Open if you want the higher overall League Score; you need the bigger context window.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Inkling or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open leads on overall League Score, 27 to 25 — a gap of 3 points on a composite of sourced benchmarks. That is overall form, not every category: check the per-category verdicts before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window, Inkling or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1M of context against 262.1K for Inkling.

Are Inkling and Muse Spark Open open source?

Inkling is open weights — it can be downloaded and self-hosted; Muse Spark Open is open weights — it can be downloaded and self-hosted.