Home  /  Compare  /  Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Head to head

Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.

Verdict by category, tale of the tape, shared benchmarks only, and cost at three workloads — all from the tracked data.

Verdict by category

CategoryMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VLWinner
League Score27.424.5Muse Spark Open
Coding (SWE-bench %)———
Reasoning (GPQA %)———
Context (tokens)10485761000000Muse Spark Open
Speed (tok/s)———

Tale of the tape

SpecMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerMetaNVIDIA
ReleasedOct 15, 2026Oct 15, 2026
League Score2724
Context1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output——
$/1M input——
$/1M output——
WeightsOpenOpen
Speed——

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VL
LiveBench overall51.650.2

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Light — 1M in / 250K out——
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out——
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out——

The pick

Pick Muse Spark Open if you want the higher overall League Score; you need the bigger context window.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Muse Spark Open leads on overall League Score, 27 to 24 — a gap of 3 points on a composite of sourced benchmarks. That is overall form, not every category: check the per-category verdicts before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Muse Spark Open, with 1M of context against 1M for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.

Are Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL open source?

Muse Spark Open is open weights — it can be downloaded and self-hosted; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is open weights — it can be downloaded and self-hosted.