Home  /  League  /  Fixtures  /  DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.6
League fixture

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K2.6.

Open-weight championship — decided by the data: category winners, tale of the tape and head-to-head benchmarks.

VS
Moonshot AI

League fixture: Open-weight championship. In Season Zero, fixture results are decided by the data — the category winners above. When voted fixtures launch, results blend 60% benchmark / 40% crowd per the published rulebook.

Verdict by category

CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6Winner
League Score75.469.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Coding (SWE-bench %)—80.2—
Reasoning (GPQA %)90.990.5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Context (tokens)1000000262144DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Speed (tok/s)213——
Price (blended $/1M)$0.52$1.71DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (cheaper)

Tale of the tape

SpecDeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6
MakerDeepSeekMoonshot AI
ReleasedSep 10, 2026Apr 20, 2026
League Score7570
Context1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output384,000—
$/1M input$0.30$0.95
$/1M output$1.20$4.00
WeightsOpenOpen
Speed213 t/s—

Head-to-head benchmarks (shared only)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6
GPQA Diamond90.990.5

Cost at three workloads

WorkloadDeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6
Light — 1M in / 250K out$0.60$1.95
Standard — 10M in / 2.5M out$6.00$19.50
Long-context — 50M in / 5M out$21.00$67.50

The pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash if you want the higher overall League Score; you need the bigger context window; you want the lower running cost.

Pick Kimi K2.6 if coding is the priority.

All figures from the model database — sources and dates on each model page. Cost your own workload or compare a different pair.